Skip Navigation

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2004 18(3):343-354; doi:10.1093/lawfam/18.3.343
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willenbacher, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

LEGAL TRANSFER OF FRENCH TRADITIONS? GERMAN AND AUSTRIAN INITIATIVES TO INTRODUCE ANONYMOUS BIRTH

Barbara Willenbacher1

1 Law Department, University of Hannover.

When anonymous birth, baby boxes or baby nests were proposed in Switzerland, Austria and Germany, those who defined the social problem in terms of panicking young mothers in distress pushed the legislatures to introduce legal anonymous birth. In Austria, they succeeded. Similar initiatives failed in Germany, but baby boxes or baby nests have been instituted nevertheless. In contrast to practices in France, anonymous birth contradicts the German legal tradition that focuses on biological descent as evidence in case of children born out of wedlock. Partisans of anonymous birth aim at preventing infanticide and child abandonment especially by mothers of minor age. However, socio-legal research reveals that the reasons for abandonment and infanticide are indistinct. The recent legal arrangements of the legitimate alternatives, abortion and adoption, are presumed to impose demands on rationality that young women, over-represented in neonaticide cases and, in France, in cases of non-recognition, cannot cope with. The ideological pro-life mix concerning anonymous birth is favoured by Protestant, Catholic, social and state welfare agencies whose purposes include ruling out the conflicting rights of the respective parties (adoptive children and biological parents) and procuring adoptable children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.