Skip Navigation

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2005 19(3):289-309; doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dey, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 19, No. 3, © The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Adapting Adoption: A Case of Closet Politics?

Ian Dey*

* Social Policy, School of Social and Political Studies, The University of Edinburgh.

Email i.dey{at}ed.ac.uk

The Adoption and Children Act 2002 addressed problems of delay in the adoption process, particularly with regard to children looked after in the care system. This article reviews the background to the Act and considers critically its emphasis on administrative reform. While the problem of delay was addressed mainly in administrative terms, the issue could not be entirely separated from political debate. In the lead-up to the Act political controversy centred on racial matching; during its passage, it focused on the legalization of same-sex adoption. The Government effectively diffused opposition on both counts through its emphasis on pragmatic reform to promote the welfare of the child. The article characterizes this approach as ‘closet politics’ and suggests that such pragmatism may exact a price in terms of implementation. The failure to address or resolve underlying issues of principle may mean that legislative change has only a limited effect on professional practice and public prejudice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Law Policy FamilyHome page
J. Tobin and R. Mcnair
Public International Law and the Regulation of Private Spaces: Does The Convention on the Rights of the Child Impose an Obligation on States to Allow Gay and Lesbian Couples to Adopt?
Int J Law Policy Family, April 1, 2009; 23(1): 110 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.