Skip Navigation


International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family Advance Access originally published online on September 23, 2005
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2006 20(1):23-43; doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/23    most recent
ebi022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonthuys, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 20, No. 1, © The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The Best Interests of Children in the South African Constitution

Elsje Bonthuys*

* Associate Professor, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

The welfare principle in cases involving children has been incorporated in the Bill of Rights of the 1996 South African Constitution, while also remaining a principle of common law. This article investigates the effects of including the best interests principle in the Constitution. It examines, first, whether the best interests principle is a constitutional right, a value, an interpretative tool or a rule of law and argues that, although courts describe it as a right, it is not treated as such. In fact, courts often use the best interests principle to avoid dealing with other constitutional rights of children and family members. The second part examines the role of the constitutional welfare principle in the development of common law rules of family law and finds a great disparity between different courts, some of which ignore the existence of the principle in the Constitution, others assuming that it has the same meaning in the Constitution as in common law and yet others using it to justify drastic changes to common law. The article suggests that the inclusion of the welfare principle in the Constitution should have concrete effects, chiefly to direct courts to conduct a proper examination of the other constitutional rights of children and other family members.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.