Skip Navigation


International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family Advance Access originally published online on June 2, 2006
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2006 20(2):225-248; doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/225    most recent
ebl013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dey, I.
Right arrow Articles by Wasoff, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 20, No. 2, © The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mixed Messages: Parental Responsibilities, Public Opinion and the Reforms of Family Law

Ian Dey and Fran Wasoff*

* School of Social and Political Studies, University of Edinburgh, Adam Ferguson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LL, UK, email fran.wasoff{at}ed.ac.uk

This article explores some issues arising when updating family law to keep pace with changes in family practices and values, in particular with changing patterns of parenting. It considers the extension of parental rights and responsibilities beyond the conventional boundaries of family law – to unmarried fathers, step-parents and grandparents – with reference to four different roles of family law. These roles are: protecting children, resolving disputes, regulating family life and promoting family norms. The article takes as an example of legal reform the recently enacted Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006, which extends parental rights and responsibilities to unmarried fathers who jointly register the child’s birth; but not to step-parents or grandparents. The mixed messages that this reform conveys are considered in relation to the latest evidence of public opinion in Scotland about parental obligations and the extent to which they align with public opinion on these issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.