Skip Navigation


International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2009
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2009 23(1):62-82; doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/62    most recent
ebn014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leckey, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 23, No. 1, © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

‘Where the Parents are of the Same Sex’: Quebec’s Reforms to Filiation

Robert Leckey*

* Faculty of Law and Institute of Comparative Law, McGill University.


   Abstract

To advance debates on legal responses to parenting by gay and lesbian couples, this article introduces reforms enacted by the legislature of Quebec, a civil law jurisdiction with a codified private law, in 2002. Quebec's pioneering regime permits two persons of the same sex to register as a child's parents from birth, not only by adoption. They may do so if they conceived the child as part of a ‘parental project’. Moreover, a person alone may have a child via a parental project. The article identifies the policy choices reflected in the amendments and highlights weaknesses in the drafting, instructive to policy makers in civil law or common law jurisdictions. It emphasizes the structural difficulty of amending the civil law's fundamental institution of filiation to recognize two parents of the same sex. Comparing with ad hoc judicial developments from a Canadian common law province, it underscores the potential in systematic legislative reform. Conservative scholars have resisted the new regime as an inappropriate departure from the pursuit of filiation's biological vocation. The study reveals how selectively jurists may remember the past and how swiftly they may characterize innovations relating to parentage – such as the earlier abolition of illegitimacy – as natural. The mingling of biological fact and fiction in the new regime underscores the similar blending in more traditional forms of filiation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.