Skip Navigation

International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 1998 12(3):288-306; doi:10.1093/lawfam/12.3.288
© 1998 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

POLITICS, CULTURE AND FAMILY LAW IN FINLAND: COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE

DAVID BRADLEY *

Co-operation with the other Nordic countries has been a primary factor in the development of family law in Finland. Within the Nordic region, a Finnish, Swedish legal tradition is in evidence. This is derived from the period when Finland formed part of Sweden and was sustained after 1809 during Finland's incorporation within the Russian Empire. Maintenance of this association after Finnish independence in 1917 has been one facet of broader collaboration with Sweden. This study examines legal policy relating to the family from an institutional perspective. From this standpoint, regulation of domestic relationships is seen as an integral part of political culture. The article traces post-war developments in Finnish family law culminating in a marriage reform enacted in 1987. Analysis of differences in approach in Finland and Sweden to the institution of marriage highlights the extent to which legal policy in this sphere is an expression of political values and processes.


* Law Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. I am particularly grateful to the following for commenting on earlier drafts: Markku Helin and Matti Savolainen of the Ministry of Justice, Raimo Lahti and Anu Pylkkänen of the University of Helsinki, Risto Jaakkola of the Research Institute of Legal Policy and Henrik Strenius of the Finnish Institute, London. Errors and opinions are mine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.