Skip Navigation



International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family Advance Access published online on May 24, 2006
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/151    most recent
ebl010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Repartnering and the Man Agement of Risk

Jane Lewis *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jane Lewis, E-mail: J.Lewis{at}lse.ac.uk


  Abstract

Social theorists working with concept of ‘risk society’ have addressed the issue of family change, suggesting that processes of individualization mean that family relationships have become ‘elective’, which has in turn raised questions about the nature of trust and commitment in intimate relationships. The position of those who are repartnering is particularly sensitive in these respects. Their awareness of risks may render them more likely to make only contingent commitments, or may make them more anxious to achieve a relationship founded on trust and commitment. We draw on in-depth interviews with a representative sample of people in England who have repartnered from a variety of types of intimate relationship into different statuses in order to explore the management of perceived risks. We find that for most respondents repartnering is a process involving different kinds of relationships, although living-apart-together is understood as something rather different. There is little support for the risk society thesis in respect of intimate relationships in respect of rejection of commitment and absence of trust. Rather, changes in relationship status often seem to be part of the process of building trust and of achieving the goal of a rather traditional relationship. This poses challenges for policymakers as they seek to regulate different statuses in different ways.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.